Forums
Doubt
AFM
answered on 18-Aug-26 08:26
Why are we doing 50:50 and 100:0 even though there are many ratios available. [Video Time Stamp: 37:33]
latest answer
Ok sir
pavan kumar
CA Final
★ 3K+
2
34
Illustration 5 of Risk Managment
AFM
answered on 17-Aug-26 05:20
Sir while using 2nd method for computation of Portfolio Variance in calculator, if we square root 0.0016 answer comes to 0.04 instead of 0.0395(which arrived in excel) and accordingly answer changes to 4,00,000 instead of 3,95,094.9253 . If we write 4,00,000 in exam will they allot marks? [Video Time Stamp: 06:51]
latest answer
Since last two exams ICAI Is specifying decimal round off that is required
falcon paradox
CA Final
★ 0
1
21
Doubt
AFM
answered on 16-Aug-26 15:59
I need the cases when we use CAPM.Most of the sums we are using CAPM even though they didn't mention the same in the question. [Video Time Stamp: 19:46]
latest answer
ICAI has not specifically provided any such list Secondly , unfortunately and more importantly they are not always consistent in the way they apply As far as exams are concerned they are providing clear instructions on usage of CAPM
pavan kumar
CA Final
★ 3K+
1
38
Doubt
AFM
answered on 16-Aug-26 15:57
Here Rf is 10% then why we are finding Rf once more. [Video Time Stamp: 18:06]
latest answer
We are not sure if these are psu/ goi bonds. It is not clear hence
pavan kumar
CA Final
★ 3K+
1
42
Doubt
AFM
answered on 16-Aug-26 20:28
Here here we have to find actual return of X+Y also [Video Time Stamp: 34:57]
latest answer
Yes we have to and we did right?
pavan kumar
CA Final
★ 3K+
3
43
Doubt
AFM
answered on 15-Aug-26 13:40
Here they have not mentioned the risk premium is same [Video Time Stamp: 01:57]
latest answer
Yes they won’t be We have not assumed anything like that We are assuming gdp premium being same for both stocks say x and and market premium for both stocks be same say y
pavan kumar
CA Final
★ 3K+
7
50
No of days investment held
AFM
answered on 14-Aug-26 20:02
For this part 4 calculation of no. Of days investment held can we do like this also, the answer anyways remains the same
latest answer
Yes I think I have similar alternate solution in notes
Lavanya Ravi
CA Final
★ 180
1
44
Proposal 1
AFM
answered on 14-Aug-26 09:45
Sir for proposal 1, in question they have said that no equity has been raised... then how we can assume that they is change in equity? Also the existing equity and debt is already in the desired ratio [Video Time Stamp: 09:54]
latest answer
In proposal 2 Exact eq cap rasied is provided so that we can arrive at debt number in proposal 1 exact eq cap raised is not provided so you have to assume it They did not say that equity should not be raised - they just did not provide the number
Balavignesh
CA Final
★ 755
1
34
Value of acquisition
AFM
answered on 14-Aug-26 10:01
the part II of the Illustration requires value of acquisition. it amounts to 1769.49 (5308.47-3538.98). But it is not mentioned, sir.
latest answer
Yes - Added that in the notes.
Jayanth
CA Final
★ 6K+
1
37
Doubt
AFM
answered on 12-Aug-26 19:32
Here we got the cost as negative which my refers to the benefit (which is negative cost) can we consider like this.
latest answer
yes you can
pavan kumar
CA Final
★ 3K+
1
45