Can u plz explain me section 6A & section 8 regarding repealment in simple words. . And also the difference between the two
Sec 6A says if anything is repealed(removed) then such repeal will not affect the continuance of amendments made to such enactment (meaning if a person has been penalised earlier and later act got amended removing the penal provision, such person will not be relieved just for the sake of amendment) and Sec 8 says if any part of previous enactments are repealed or re-enacted then references in other acts to such enactment shall mean reference to re-enacted part (latest amendment). It says the re-enacted act (latest) is always referred once it is amended.
Thread StarterShruthi V
I dint understand
6A Say there is an Act in which an amendement was done. Later the act was repealed. The amendment existing in earlier Act doesnt get invalidated. 8 One Act (Act 1) refers to a provision in another Act (Act 2). Provision in Act 2 is amended. Now all references in Act 1 is to the amendement in Act 2.