powered by logo

Forums

Working capital management cash cost method

Financial Management

answered on 11-Feb-23 19:35

In this question i have issue that while making p&l Wages are paid for 11 months as 1 month is in arrears And in solution wages of 11 months is considered My main question is while calculating respective costs such as cost of production or sale --- Do we follow CASH BASIS and IGNORE ACCRUAL BASIS

latest answer

Question directly mentioned to work it on cash cost basis It is done accordingly But, if cash method - it will be mentioned Otherwise accrual basis is preferred

Abhishek Bansal 2002 AK

Abhishek Bansal 2002 AK

CA Final

2K+

1

459

Sir why this happen sir revision in phar book able to recollect every thing but stop revision then feeling I forget all whatever we study last months why this happened sir

Exams

answered on 11-Feb-23 19:53

Sir

latest answer

Thats why you need to continuous revisions.

R K

R K

ACCA Skill

9K+

5

539

Dividend

Corporate & Other Laws

answered on 11-Feb-23 22:39

I didn't understand this para , y discount on issues of shares is not allowed

latest answer

In the given statement depreciation is charge against profits. So they have linked this topic to issue of shares at discount.

Reetikaa R

Reetikaa R

CA Final

7K+

4

532

Gift vouchers

Others

answered on 11-Feb-23 09:13

Sir/mam, i have registered in gift vouchers for foundation exam and cleared. How to get that gift voucher?

latest answer

Only for students who have enrolled for a subject or entire course.

Vijay K

Vijay K

CA Inter

9K+

4

564

Indian contact act

Corporate & Other Laws

answered on 10-Feb-23 15:25

Can anyone explain this In case of fraudulent silence, contracts are not voidable if the party whose consent was so obtained had the means of discovering the truth with ordinary diligence

latest answer

e statement "In case of fraudulent silence, contracts are not voidable if the party whose consent was so obtained had the means of discovering the truth with ordinary diligence" refers to the concept of fraudulent silence in contract law. It means that if one party deliberately fails to disclose material information to the other party during the formation of a contract, this can be considered as fraud. However, if the party whose consent was obtained through fraudulent silence had the means to discover the truth about the material information with reasonable efforts, the contract may not be considered voidable. In other words, the party who was not fully informed has a duty to exercise ordinary diligence to discover the truth about the material information that was not disclosed to them. If they fail to do so, then they may not be able to use the fraudulent silence as a basis to void the contract. It's important to note that the concept of fraudulent silence varies between legal jurisdictions, and the specific laws and rules in each jurisdiction should be consulted to fully understand the implications of this principle. shivaji hari can you give example for this Sure! Here's an example to help illustrate the principle of fraudulent silence in contract law: Imagine that a person, John, wants to sell his car to another person, Jane. John knows that the car has a faulty transmission, but he fails to disclose this information to Jane when negotiating the sale of the car. If Jane had the means to discover the truth about the faulty transmission with ordinary diligence (for example, by taking the car for a test drive or having a mechanic Here's an example to help illustrate the principle of fraudulent silence in contract law: Imagine that a person, John, wants to sell his car to another person, Jane. John knows that the car has a faulty transmission, but he fails to disclose this information to Jane when negotiating the sale of the car. If Jane had the means to discover the truth about the faulty transmission with ordinary diligence (for example, by taking the car for a test drive or having a mechanic inspect it), and she failed to do so, then the contract between John and Jane may not be considered voidable due to John's fraudulent silence. However, if Jane had no means of discovering the truth about the faulty transmission (for example, if John had taken the transmission out of the car before Jane saw it), then the contract between John and Jane may be considered voidable due to John's fraudulent silence. In this case, Jane would have a valid basis to void the contract and demand a return of any consideration that she provided to John in exchange for the car.

SUBODH M JAIN

SUBODH M JAIN

CA Final

2K+

1

478

Illu 10 consolidation

Accountancy

answered on 11-Feb-23 20:09

They are saying no adjustnent in respect of inventory As there will be no impact on p/l of current year.but here the opening balance of reserves doesn't contain imapct of inventory (12000) shouldn't we adjust that

latest answer

https://youtu.be/ZknwanFsttU solved here.

Gauri Shete

Gauri Shete

CA Final

5K+

1

519

Doubt

Exams

answered on 10-Feb-23 14:10

In Exam While writing section we know section,sub-section but we don't know clause can we write it. Like wise we know section but don't know sub-section & clause can we write it.

latest answer

If you remember section, quote. Else do not quote. Same applies to subsection and clause. Also note that quoting subsection without section does not add any value.

Fathima Hamtha Hussaina

Fathima Hamtha Hussaina

CA Final

12K+

3

678

Section 52 and Section 63 of Companies Act 2013 and Accountancy

Accountancy

answered on 10-Feb-23 13:16

As per section 52 , Securities Premium may be applied for nullifying Premium on Redemption of preference shares. But , ICAI Material has never transferred Premium on Redemption to Securities Premium A/C , instead it has always transferred it to ,Profit and Loss A/C. Can I do method as in Section 52 , in exams ??

latest answer

Yes.

Varun Mulay

Varun Mulay

CA Final

39K+

3

1K+

Logical reasoning

Maths & Stats

answered on 10-Feb-23 21:01

Please solve this problem with explanation

latest answer

Yes zero we are getting

SUBODH M JAIN

SUBODH M JAIN

CA Final

2K+

6

776

CASH PURCHASE AND SALE and LATER ON RETURNED WHERE TO BE SHOWN?

Accountancy

answered on 10-Feb-23 15:23

Sir, If we have done cash purchase or cash sale and later on those goods are returned , then those will not be entered in RETURNS BOOK,, then where will these transactions be recorded sir ? . What will be the Journal entry if we returned goods to our supplier which we had purchased on a cash biases ? If we are returning an asset , it will not be shown in purchase return book,, then where it will be shown. Why I am asking you this, video lecture is silent about these transactions where to be recorded. Please guide me sir.

latest answer

Thank you sir.

Thankachan Jimmy

Thankachan Jimmy

CMA Inter

0

7

3K+