powered by logo

Forums

Rule 5 of Baggage Rules, 2016

Indirect Taxation

answered on 09-Oct-25 16:52

Does that mean a transgender won't be able to claim the benefit under Rule 5 of Baggage Rules, 2016. [Video Time Stamp: 06:51]

latest answer

Law is silent on that scenario.

Yug Bhattad

Yug Bhattad

CA Final

63K+

1

152

Elimination of double counting NCI

Financial Reporting

answered on 11-Oct-25 20:04

Sir, in step 6, the logic behind the reduction of (20% of 280) is not clarified. And Why are we computed on 280? Logically both are not cleared. Can you please explain sir? [Video Time Stamp: 00:00]

latest answer

We consolidate all assets of subsidiary. The investment in SS by S is also a part of this. HOwever this has to be eliminated during the consolidatino process during goodwill computation. Out of the 280 of investment made by S, only 80% belongs to the parent. And 20% to NCI. For other net assets we take 100% and put relevant NCI share (as payable). Here we are only considering 80% which is relevant for our goodwill computation.

pooja lakshmi

pooja lakshmi

CA Final

2K+

1

154

Advanced Capital Budgeting - Illu : 14

AFM

answered on 08-Oct-25 08:09

Sir, while calculating standard deviation of the expected value, why the discounting rate had a power of year multiple by the 2?

latest answer

Thank you Sir

Prethivi Rajan

Prethivi Rajan

CA Final

9K+

2

166

Getting wrong answer

Accountancy

answered on 08-Oct-25 16:54

12,70,000 - 72,000 - 6,05,000-30,000 =5,63,000 But in the books and video there is 5,75,000 Explain me [Video Time Stamp: 11:13]

latest answer

It is correct only. purchase returns should be reduced from the purchases. So the gross profit will be 6,23,000

Manikanta Abhiram

Manikanta Abhiram

CA Foundation

0

1

155

years of act

Exams

answered on 09-Oct-25 10:00

Is it necessary to mention the years of the banking act, electricity act amd IRDA iin exams? [Video Time Stamp: 21:18]

latest answer

ONce you refer to these 2-3 times you will automatically remember. dont overstress.

Rithu V

Rithu V

CA Inter

4K+

1

157

related to the table made in question no 3

AFM

answered on 07-Oct-25 17:40

why we take beta of market value is 1 [Video Time Stamp: 00:04]

latest answer

Beta

Abhay Goyal

Abhay Goyal

CA Foundation

180

1

108

Amalgamation exps

Accountancy

answered on 09-Oct-25 10:02

Is it optional to journal entry amalgamation expenses or we can leave it and also illustration 5 of study material - interest is due ,we have to transfer interest to realisation account or entry for payment anything is not given in additional information

latest answer

If amalgamation expense details are given - you need to journal it. Interest payable - this might be taken over by the purchasing company. If it is paid by the selling company, you can transfer to realisation account and then pass the payment entry Realisation A/c Dr. To Bank A/c

Anushka Kumawat

Anushka Kumawat

CA Inter

0

1

145

Doubts in Illustration 24

Financial Management

answered on 07-Oct-25 14:07

1. Sir, in video lecture no. 25, where in you have explained that the ICAI have comeup with simplifying the terms regarding Net Proceed, stating that, in questions, we need not worry about redeemable or irredeemable cases wrt to Market value of book value. It was Mentioned that if the issue price is given, or mentions about at par/premium/discount in the question were made, then we can choose such IP, only in absence of these info. we can choose MP. But in this question, even though the question has mentioned that the IP was at Par, we assumed it to be made at MP. this method is in contrary of the video lecture 25, where we are continuing to follow the old model of calculating NP. 2. Sir, here at this point( after fresh issue) you have assumed that the cost of retained earning is to be the same as earlier. i.e. 16% alternatively, why cant we assume that , due to additional issue of fresh equity shares, the cost of retained earning has also been increased and the new cost of retained earning is 18.25% as computed in the later Ke. [Video Time Stamp: 09:48]

latest answer

K of RE is existing RE and Ke of 18.25% is Ke of fresh addition to equity . you cannot assume both to be same Question no where says issued at PAR - it only says fully paid up at PAR - both are different . pls have a relook at video specifically between minutes 3 & 4

Vinod Kumar

Vinod Kumar

CA Inter

11K+

1

141

Payment through Electronic Cash Ledger

Indirect Taxation

answered on 09-Oct-25 16:52

So now it's permitted to make payment at International courier terminal through electronic cash ledger? [Video Time Stamp: 04:00]

latest answer

Yes.

Yug Bhattad

Yug Bhattad

CA Final

63K+

1

161

Variation in answer due to decimal values

Financial Management

answered on 07-Oct-25 06:07

Sir, I took 3 values after decimal, and got Ko as 14.001% [Video Time Stamp: 07:25]

latest answer

That’s ok Marks won’t be deducted

Vinod Kumar

Vinod Kumar

CA Inter

11K+

1

117