powered by logo

Forums

Borrowing in USD

AFM

answered on 15-Aug-25 19:55

Sir, i didn't understood the logic of considering ASK rate (36.40) while converting USD to INR? [Video Time Stamp: 06:00]

latest answer

Understood sir!

Ranjith Belide

Ranjith Belide

CA Final

★ 6K+

2

221

TEST YOUR UNDERTANDING - 3 (INVESTIGATION)

Auditing

answered on 22-Mar-26 14:20

Good Morning mam, (wishing the 1FIN team a Happy 79th Independence Day)... Mam, as in this case, the auditor is appointed to verify financial data and that too which represent historical data. The auditor cannot give reasonable assurance because the records are for interim period only BUT STILL ....The auditor can provide MODERATE ASSURANCE in name of REVIEW ENGAGEMENT, instead of INVESTIGATION. isnt it mam? Because an auditor is not expected to have expertise in the field of investigating the details of FIRE Accident, also for investigation, the Insurance PSU has already appointed a person from their feild. Then is it correct to understand that the auditor here appointed to provide a REVIEW ASSURANCE with the interim financial records? [Video Time Stamp: 07:30]

latest answer

If records stop before 31st March, it indicates they are interim in nature.

Vinod Kumar

Vinod Kumar

CA Inter

★ 11K+

4

217

BRS - Nikki & Co

Accountancy

answered on 19-Aug-25 11:35

Sir, in the above nikki & co example - point 7. In Point 7, it states that there is a Dr in the bank statement, meaning in the passbook Dr side (Outflow), but we have considered it as Dr in the cash book (bank column) (Inflow). Why? I'm not able to understand this adjustments logic sir. [Video Time Stamp: 07:12]

latest answer

As we are making change in pass book. In the given point when cheque received we increased the cash balance. So to balance with cash book we increase the balance in the passbook.

Vignesh Venkatesan

Vignesh Venkatesan

CA Final

★ 5

1

262

Itt and occ

Others

answered on 14-Aug-25 18:35

Is it mandatory to complete these courses before joining articleship or i can do these after joining articleship?

latest answer

Thank you sir.

Sugam SM

Sugam SM

CA Final

★ 9K+

2

251

Percentage of downside risk formula

AFM

answered on 04-Apr-26 17:26

Sir, just to confirm — if the question asks us to find the below, is the formula used is correct?" 1. Percentage of downside risk = (MP of convertible bond-Straight value of bond)/ MP of convertible bond (ill-43) 2.Premium over Straight value of bond = (MP of convertible bond-Straight value of bond)/Straight value of bond. (mentioed in ill-29) [Video Time Stamp: 04:30]

latest answer

I agree with you. What I wanted to say above did not come out clearly. When you call something downside risk, denominator has to be higher value and when you say premium it has to be lower value. Pls check Q no 24 of icai SM link below and screenshot of ICAI solution also attached. I was referring to Ill 24 where question says downside risk. so anchor has to be higher amount - but they provided solution with denominator as higher amount - this is what I was alluding to as ICAI Logic This kind of dichotomy is present in past RTP/ SA/ MTP too. https://resource.cdn.icai.org/87846bos-aps2163-ch5.pdf page 66 of 72

Shinisha  Rose R

Shinisha Rose R

CA Final

★ 5K+

3

692

AS 15 DCP

Accountancy

answered on 14-Aug-25 18:27

Sir, in the video its said that under dcp, the risk falls on the 3rd party contribution plan entity, whoever it is. But in textbook it is written risk falls on employee. What's the concept in here then?

latest answer

ok

Rahul Anand

Rahul Anand

CA Inter

★ 6K+

2

311

SQC 1 and SA 220

Auditing

answered on 16-Aug-25 22:41

How to distinguish both these in the case study? Both these represent the same.

latest answer

No they don’t . One is at firm level for every type of engagement. Be it audit, review or non assurance as well . But SA 220 is only for audit . Responsibility in SQC 1 is of partners ( managing partners , CEO etc) In SA 220 , it’s engagement partner alone . One Is at firm level other is at engagement level!

Shankari C

Shankari C

CA Inter

★ 3K+

1

276

Optimal portfolio

AFM

answered on 17-Aug-25 12:40

Hi sir, In the previous problem, i.e, in the 67 problem, you said we use actual returns for the computation of sharpe formulae. Why we are doing all computions here for finding ER [Video Time Stamp: 24:54]

latest answer

Ok sir tq for reply.

sailusha ravikrindi

sailusha ravikrindi

CA Final

★ 110

2

274

e^rt

AFM

answered on 14-Aug-25 12:49

Sir, instead of days, i took months in 't' for calculation and got the same answer. Which is preferable if nothing is specified in question about days? [Video Time Stamp: 11:01]

latest answer

E power rt

Banu Priya

Banu Priya

CA Final

★ 6K+

1

228

BRS

Accountancy

answered on 19-Aug-25 14:30

Sir, we considered this as a liability account and solved entire sum, can we instead to maintain uniformity, treat the opening balance in OD as -ve number and apply the same logics of earlier sums? Meaning we had + Interest on OD, Bank Charges in this sum, while in regular sums we would have - it.

latest answer

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MlOUbwrkBag

Vignesh Venkatesan

Vignesh Venkatesan

CA Final

★ 5

2

265