Forums
Back
Corporate & Other Laws
In Corporate law video 57 or part 3, the conclusion drawn, for the case study on whether Nisha has to withdraw her nominee because she has to leave the country post marriage, is that she is not eligible as she is not a resident. However, in the explanation the criteria states that the nominee has to be a. natural person, b. indian citizen, c. whether resident of otherwise. If resident or otherwise is what is stated in rule 3, Nisha can continue to be a nominee. Why it is stated she cannot continue. Please clarify.
Answers (2)