powered by logo

Forums

Back

Rebate

Accountancy

In below attached ques how 77 days came I got confused?

3ac322f8-4eef-4628-8f8b-0bee500eb4c2.jpg
ba8f44f0-edef-4b6e-9eba-48dad713b637.jpg

Miradevi S

Miradevi S

CA Final

16K+

27-Oct-21 15:28

624

Answers (13)

Calculation is shown there.


Himanshu Somani

Himanshu Somani

CA Final

97K+

27-Oct-21 16:13

Ya.... But 31+29 +15 should come right?


Thread Starter

Miradevi S

Miradevi S

CA Final

16K+

27-Oct-21 16:39

Thread Starter

Miradevi S

Ya.... But 31+29 +15 should come right?

Jan =31 Feb = 28 ( assumed that its not a leap year) March = 15 + 3 days of grace = 18


Christeena Ambel

Christeena Ambel

CA Inter

5K+

27-Oct-21 23:59

Himanshu Somani

How?

I thought february to be 29 days as it is 2012 and considered upto March 15 and forgot 3 days of grace. So that little bit confusion


Thread Starter

Miradevi S

Miradevi S

CA Final

16K+

28-Oct-21 05:28

Thread Starter

Miradevi S

I thought february to be 29 days as it is 2012 and considered upto March 15 and forgot 3 days of grace. So that little bit confusion

Yeah.. Actually 2012 is leap year.. But they have given 20x1..


Christeena Ambel

Christeena Ambel

CA Inter

5K+

28-Oct-21 05:50

Thread Starter

Miradevi S

Thank you :)

^_^


Christeena Ambel

Christeena Ambel

CA Inter

5K+

28-Oct-21 05:51

Christeena Ambel

^_^

:)


Thread Starter

Miradevi S

Miradevi S

CA Final

16K+

28-Oct-21 05:54

Christeena Ambel

Yeah.. Actually 2012 is leap year.. But they have given 20x1..

If it is leap year also we can take 28 days for Feb right?


Thread Starter

Miradevi S

Miradevi S

CA Final

16K+

28-Oct-21 07:42

Thread Starter

Miradevi S

If it is leap year also we can take 28 days for Feb right?

For leap year i think we can take 29..and can provide a note regarding the assumption taken.. I guess


Christeena Ambel

Christeena Ambel

CA Inter

5K+

28-Oct-21 08:11

Thread Starter

Miradevi S

OK sis thank you :)

:)


Christeena Ambel

Christeena Ambel

CA Inter

5K+

28-Oct-21 13:44

Your Reply