powered by logo

Forums

Back

The Infamous Lucky Ltd sum

Accountancy

Sir, shouldn't the "Compensation expense of the year" be divided by 3, instead of 2, Because its being vested over period of 3 years?

20201126_191226.jpg
20201126_191257.jpg

Kumarjit Dey

Kumarjit Dey

CA Inter

4K+

26-Nov-20 19:18

628

Answers (4)

Best Answer

As a matter of prudence, worst case scenario for company is assumed. So at the end of first year, it is assumed that the vesting condition would be satisfied by the end of second year.


CA Suraj Lakhotia

CA Suraj Lakhotia

Admin

27-Nov-20 15:21

Thread Starter

Kumarjit Dey

In all other sums excet this one, ICAI have assumed over 3 years and divided by 3. So it will be okay if I apply the same is question is silent about it?

No. Here its not a three year vesting but a conditional vesting. Which could have happened in year 1 or year 2 or year 3.


CA Suraj Lakhotia

CA Suraj Lakhotia

Admin

27-Nov-20 17:43

CA Suraj Lakhotia Admin

No. Here its not a three year vesting but a conditional vesting. Which could have happened in year 1 or year 2 or year 3.

Oh ok. Conditional vesting. I will keep that in mind :


Thread Starter

Kumarjit Dey

Kumarjit Dey

CA Inter

4K+

27-Nov-20 18:03

Your Reply