powered by logo

Forums

Back

Theory

Maths & Stats

Isn't it both as for mutually exclusive The limits appear same but for mutually inclusive it appears different. Ques 33

ea4b7d57-a7a3-4f69-b25a-59add0cfeb74.jpg

Sugam SM

Sugam SM

CA Final

9K+

28-Jun-22 10:19

556

Answers (1)

Best Answer

You are right in principle. But here there is another way of interpreting too. In exclusive classification, upper limit of one class is the same as the lower limit of the successive class. But there, upper limit is excluded from that class and inluced in next class. Example: In mutually exclusive classification, 10-20, 20-30, 30,-40, 20 will be included in 20-30 and not 10-20. So, we may say 20 is not actually the upper limit of 10-20 as upper limit is defined as maximum value that class interval may contain and it will be less than 20 only. So, fine line here. Don't worry, as exam today. If this question gets asked, you can go with option b.


Sahibdeep Singh

Sahibdeep Singh

CA Inter

14K+

28-Jun-22 11:04

Your Reply